Irish Tour

Book being read; F. Cannan, Galloglass 1250-1600: Gaellic Mercenary Warrior

After a brilliant, and very wet, research trip to Pilleth in Wales my eyes have become firmly set on the trip to Ireland in a few weeks time. The Glyn Dwr article is written and submitted, an article about using ‘Homer as a Source’ which I did for Ancient Warfare Magazine is now out and I have begun work on a book review (note the book above) for Medieval Warfare Magazine.

So as the projects have come to an end, or are certainly coming to an end, I thought to myself why not sort out Ireland? So the tickets are booked, the car is hired, Ali the Archaeologist is on board, and now to sort out the tour. The map will coming to blog near you soon.

As is inevitable when one from an Irish family, such as myself, declares he’s off to Ireland, I have found family falling out of the woodwork much to my surprise and appreciation, offering places to stay and castles to see. I have no doubt this trip, which is only a week long . . . for the whole of Ireland? why not, will be an adventure. The trip will be a tour of early medieval castles, looking at how they changed from the south Wales prototypes into a uniquely Irish manifestation. And if there’s time, and even if there isn’t, we shall be beginning work on another project called the best pint in Ireland; I have high hopes for this one!

Just a short blog today, much to do, much to do.

Posted in Ancient History & My Research | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Applying for Postgraduate Research

Book being read: None, ha! I am researching for sites in Ireland for the tour so that is my main priority at the moment. I did find an amazing site for anyone who wants to see where a varied host of monuments/ruins/buildings of historical significance in Eire are http://webgis.archaeology.ie/NationalMonuments/FlexViewer/

Trying to become an Historical researcher

In the past few weeks I have been approached by 3 different people asking me for advice regarding how to get into researching.  They meant through the normal academic avenues, but the principals are still the same for those who want to do it on their own.  I once asked this question of a well known historian of Japanese popular history and found his advice of great help to me, indeed it is the cause of my expansion into popular history!

“You are already a historian.  There is nothing to stop you using the skills you have to write and publish, just like me.  I didnt take a PHD till I was 45.

The secret:

1.  Choose something no one else has done much about

2.   Believe in yourself

3.   Be persistent and be bold.

4.    Remember that most librarians have very little to do that is interesting.  Your request for anything on the Victorian rhubarb industry in Wakefield will make their day.  I am in Japan right now, and was told by an eminent professor that two important diaries I wanted had never been published.  I didnt believe him, and the Okinawa Prefectural Library proved him wrong!”

How to become a Postgraduate Researcher of History

I would add to this some things that I have learnt from my own experiences about going down the academic route:
Number One: Be able to articulate the idea you want to pursue, you get a better response from people if you already know the answers to their questions and critiques.  And don’t underestimate the response “that’s what my research will look to answer”.

Number Two: By about the November of your masters you want to be in touch with prospective supervisors.  You can’t underestimate networking.  This doesn’t mean you have to have met them.  By the end of my BA I had already begun emailling a very eminent professor in my field for random research help (like advice on a source, that sort of thing) so when it came to looking for a PhD supervisor he put me in touch with another professor who would most likely be interested, and so it became easier to begin discussing the idea and getting him to agree to take it on.

Number Three: Understand the strength of your idea, if you know why it is amazing then it is easier to convince others of it.

Number Four: Have about 2 or 3 supervisor options, one ‘no’ is not a damning review of the idea but usually a clash of ideas or else conflict of interest. Something I forgot when I started looking was that every academic you talk to has a self interest they need to protect, so don’t get downhearted if the leader of the field tells you your idea can’t work (that happened to me regarding Ancient Sparta, but it was because the scholar had made his name writing in a certain way which mine would contradict.)

Number Five: The supervisor’s name is more important than a university’s name.  Get the best academic  in the field you can rather than the best university you can – that is only important up to the Masters level, and only if you want a job in the non academic market.

So I hope that helps anyone who wants it, but as always feel free to throw questions my way.

Posted in University Life | Leave a comment

Seeking Truth?

Book being read: R. Waterfield, Xenophon’s retreat: Greece, Persia and the end of the Golden Age, 2006

I have just come back from Istanbul, a.k.a. Byzantium, a.k.a. New Rome and had an amazing time, as one would expect.  Whilst there we stumbled across a museum which is not yet fully functioning, but is open! The History of Science and Technology in Islam has apparently been open for 4 years but has the feel of a work in progress.  That being said everyone should go, if they can! It brings to light how different cultures have approached the same problems and have come to their own conclusions at their own pace.  Don’t be confused, our culture has been rather slow compared to Islam’s own.

The perfect example comes from Ibn al-Haitham (what do you mean you’ve never heard of him! . . . Neither had I) who in the 10th-11th century expounded ideals which were not truly replicated by west European thought until the Enlightenment period (18th century).  A quote I wanted to pass on, perhaps because of new historical directions I am undertaking at the moment, goes as follows:

“Whosoever seeks the truth will not proceed by studying the writings of his predecessors and by simply accepting his own good opinion of them.  Rather the truth-seeker will mistrust his established opinion.  He will rely solely on his understanding of the texts by following the criteria of logic rather than the statements of authors who are, after all, human, with the errors and faults which this normally involves.”

This is something I am thinking a lot about at the moment, especially as I have put my PhD on hold and explore the possibility that maybe, just maybe, there is another way of doing this.  That, contrary to what we are told in academia you do not have to have a doctorate to be a success, and that popular history does not have to be ill-informed drivel spouted by old bigots wearing tweed.  Maybe a happy medium can be struck? Maybe.

Well I am testing that theory in this first half of the year, 6 months which will see 2 popular history articles come out, a research trip through south Wales and the Republic of Ireland (more to follow in later blogs!! But for a brief synopsis see below), and a secondary research trip for an article on the battle of Bryn Glas.  There are exciting times ahead it seems.

Road trip:

As of the beginning of May, an archaeologist friend of mine Ali and I are doing a long trip tracing the evolution of castles from South Wales as they crossed into Ireland with the Normans.  It will be the largest, and most likely the most unofficial, exploration of Irish Castles ever! and that is not a joke.  It taps into a deep seated controversy in Ireland (ultimately it was the beginning of ‘English’ control in the land), combined with the fact that Ali and I very rarely agree . . . on anything . . . ever, it should be an interesting diversion from work at least.  The aim is for this to become a book, and look out over the next year in Medieval Warfare Magazine as a serialisation agreement is almost complete!  It will also all be here on the blog . . . I may have to make a new section, where’s that manual?  Oh well.

So stay tuned.

Posted in Ancient History & My Research, Lessons Outside of Syllabus, Tangents | Leave a comment

Back by Popular Demand

Book being read: The entire Winnie the Pooh Collection (including all AA Milne’s Poems) . . . not sure I should admit that really

I have decided to fulfill a new year’s resolution so here it is, the most popular blog I have posted in full.  This translation comes from the brilliant resource for Gender in Antiquity, the Diotima,and is the translation of Diane Svarlien.

I suppose I should say that this poem in no way reflects my views on women!  But two things I do find interesting, firstly that the common complaints of men about women have not seemed to change much over 2’500 years (which I’m sure must be true the other way round).  Secondly, note how to the Ancient Greeks it is the women who are sex obsessed not men.  This is also true in ancient Rome.  So when did men take over this mantle? Anyway, enjoy.

Semonides (Poem 7); The Different Types of Women

From the start, the gods made women different.

One type is from a pig–a hairy sow

whose house is like a rolling heap of filth;

and she herself, unbathed, in unwashed clothes,

reposes on the shit-pile, growing fat.

Another type the gods made from a fox:

pure evil, and aware of everything.

This woman misses nothing: good or bad,

she notices, considers, and declares

that good is bad and bad is good. Her mood

changes from one moment to the next.

One type is from a dog–a no-good bitch,

a mother through and through;

she wants to hear everything, know everything, go everywhere,

and stick her nose in everything, and bark

whether she sees anyone or not.

A man can’t stop her barking; not with threats,

not (when he’s had enough) by knocking out

her teeth with a stone, and not with sweet talk either;

even among guests, she’ll sit and yap;

the onslaught of her voice cannot be stopped.

One type the gods of Mount Olympus crafted

out of Earth–their gift to man! She’s lame

and has no sense of either good or bad.

She knows no useful skill, except to eat

–and, when the gods make winter cold and hard

to drag her chair up closer to the fire.

Another type is from the Sea; she’s two-faced.

One day she’s calm and smiling–any guest

who sees her in your home will praise her then:

“This woman is the best in all the world

and also the most beautiful.” The next day

she’s wild and unapproachable, unbearable

even to look at, filled with snapping hate,

ferocious, like a bitch with pups, enraged

at loved ones and at enemies alike.

Just as the smooth unrippled sea at times

stands still, a joy to mariners in summer,

and then at times is wild with pounding waves—

This woman’s temperament is just like that.

The ocean has its own perplexing ways.

Another type is from a drab, gray ass;

she’s used to getting smacked, and won’t give in

until you threaten her and really force her.

She’ll do her work all right, and won’t complain;

but then she eats all day, all night–she eats

everything in sight, in every room.

And when it comes to sex, she’s just as bad;

she welcomes any man that passes by.

Another loathsome, miserable type

is from a weasel: undesirable

in every way–un-charming, un-alluring.

She’s sex-crazed, too; but any man who climbs

aboard her will get seasick. And she steals

from neighbors, and from sacrificial feasts.

Another type a horse with flowing mane

gave birth to. She avoids all kinds of work

and hardship; she would never touch a mill

or lift a sieve, or throw the shit outside,

or sit beside the oven (all that soot!).

She’ll touch her husband only when she has to.

She washes off her body every day

twice, sometimes three times! then rubs herself

with perfumed oil. She always wears her hair

combed-out, and dressed with overhanging flowers.

Such a wife is beautiful to look at

for others; for her keeper, she’s a pain

–unless he is a king, or head of state

who can afford extravagant delights.

Another type is from an ape. I’d say

that Zeus made her the greatest pain of all—

his gift to man! Her face is hideous.

This woman is a total laughingstock

when she walks through the town. She has no neck,

no butt–she’s all legs. You should see the way

she moves around. I pity the poor man

who holds this horrid woman in his arms.

She’s well-versed in every kind of trick

just like an ape; what’s more, she has no shame

and doesn’t care if people laugh at her.

She’d never think of doing something kind

to anyone; she plots the whole day long

to see how she can do the greatest harm.

Another type is from a bee. Good luck

in finding such a woman! Only she

deserves to be exempt from stinging blame.

The household that she manages will thrive;

a loving wife beside her loving man,

she’ll grow old, having borne illustrious

and handsome children; she herself shines bright

among all women. Grace envelops her.

She doesn’t like to sit with other women

discussing sex. Zeus gratifies mankind

with these most excellent and thoughtful wives.

But by the grim contrivances of Zeus

all these other types are here to stay

side by side with man forever. Yes,

Zeus made this the greatest pain of all: Woman.

If she seems to want to help

that’s when she does her keeper the most harm.

A man who’s with a woman can’t get through

a single day without a troubled mind. He’ll never banish Hunger from his house:

unwelcome, hateful lodger, hostile god.

Just when a man seems most content at home

and ready for enjoyment, by the grace

of god or man, that’s when she’ll pick a fight,

her battle-helmet flashing, full of blame.

A household with a woman is at a loss

to give a decent welcome to a guest.

The wife who seems the most restrained and good,

she’s the most disastrous of them all;

for while her slack-jawed husband gapes at her

the neighbors laugh at how he’s been deceived.

Each man will diligently praise his own

and blame the next man’s wife; we just don’t see

that we all share alike in this hard luck.

For Zeus made this the greatest pain of all

and locked us in a shackle hard as iron

and never to be broken, ever since

the day that Hades opened up his gates

for all the men who fought that woman’s war.

Another type is from a drab, gray ass;

she’s used to getting smacked, and won’t give in

until you threaten her and really force her.

She’ll do her work all right, and won’t complain;

but then she eats all day, all night–she eats

everything in sight, in every room.

And when it comes to sex, she’s just as bad;

she welcomes any man that passes by.

Another loathsome, miserable type

is from a weasel: undesirable

in every way–un-charming, un-alluring.

She’s sex-crazed, too; but any man who climbs

aboard her will get seasick. And she steals

from neighbors, and from sacrificial feasts.

Another type a horse with flowing mane

gave birth to. She avoids all kinds of work

and hardship; she would never touch a mill

or lift a sieve, or throw the shit outside,

or sit beside the oven (all that soot!).

She’ll touch her husband only when she has to.

She washes off her body every day

twice, sometimes three times! then rubs herself

with perfumed oil. She always wears her hair

combed-out, and dressed with overhanging flowers.

Such a wife is beautiful to look at

for others; for her keeper, she’s a pain

–unless he is a king, or head of state

who can afford extravagant delights.

Another type is from an ape. I’d say

that Zeus made her the greatest pain of all—

his gift to man! Her face is hideous.

This woman is a total laughingstock

when she walks through the town. She has no neck,

no butt–she’s all legs. You should see the way

she moves around. I pity the poor man

who holds this horrid woman in his arms.

She’s well-versed in every kind of trick

just like an ape; what’s more, she has no shame

and doesn’t care if people laugh at her.

She’d never think of doing something kind

to anyone; she plots the whole day long

to see how she can do the greatest harm.

Another type is from a bee. Good luck

in finding such a woman! Only she

deserves to be exempt from stinging blame.

The household that she manages will thrive;

a loving wife beside her loving man,

she’ll grow old, having borne illustrious

and handsome children; she herself shines bright

among all women. Grace envelops her.

She doesn’t like to sit with other women

discussing sex. Zeus gratifies mankind

with these most excellent and thoughtful wives.

But by the grim contrivances of Zeus

all these other types are here to stay

side by side with man forever. Yes,

Zeus made this the greatest pain of all: Woman.

If she seems to want to help

that’s when she does her keeper the most harm.

A man who’s with a woman can’t get through

a single day without a troubled mind. He’ll never banish Hunger from his house:

unwelcome, hateful lodger, hostile god.

Just when a man seems most content at home

and ready for enjoyment, by the grace

of god or man, that’s when she’ll pick a fight,

her battle-helmet flashing, full of blame.

A household with a woman is at a loss

to give a decent welcome to a guest.

The wife who seems the most restrained and good,

she’s the most disastrous of them all;

for while her slack-jawed husband gapes at her

the neighbors laugh at how he’s been deceived.

Each man will diligently praise his own

and blame the next man’s wife; we just don’t see

that we all share alike in this hard luck.

For Zeus made this the greatest pain of all

and locked us in a shackle hard as iron

and never to be broken, ever since

the day that Hades opened up his gates

for all the men who fought that woman’s war.

Posted in University Life | Leave a comment

2011 and into 12!

Books being read: Jamie’s Great Britain!  That’s right, not a history book!

It has been just over a year since I set up this website and I thought I’d have a look at the stats.

1,392 visits of which 882 are unique visitors – I don’t know 882 people so that is exciting!

The most popular blog has been Semonides poem on Women, not a big surprise (but as it is only half the poem I may have to put it up in full next year.)

The country which spends the longest looking at the site in each visit is New Zealand (?) at 4 minutes 22, followed closely by Estonia and Spain (??)

It seems I must thank friend and artist Ben Mills who gives me the 4th most amount of traffic after google, direct traffic and facebook.

The busiest day of traffic was during the student protests, not really sure why but it was.

And 36% of traffic are returning visitors so thank you for that.

Anyway that’s enough self-indulgence.  It has been a time of busy work with the Berserker article in its final editing with Medieval Warfare Magazine and it looks very flash with the new illustrations.  There is also an article being written on how to use Homer’s poems as historical sources, including the common pitfalls in using him; that comes out next year for Ancient Warfare Magazine.  My latest thesis chapter is under review from my supervisor, which if all is well will be being finalised for the PhD upgrade in November. Finally I have been asked to give a paper at the Classical Associations Conference in Exeter on new research methods in Ancient Military History with some fellow PhD students from UCL.  This takes us to April. It should be an exciting new year indeed.

Posted in Ancient History & My Research, Tangents | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Dogs, animals and beasts

Book being read; Sagas of the Icelanders, (London, 2001)

A busy period has meant an empty blog, but as my work gets even busier I felt the blog should not suffer!

I have been thinking a lot about dogs at the moment, most obviously because I have not long acquired a puppy named Gus.  It reminded me of a paper I heard given whilst studying my masters at Nottingham Uni, it was about the relationship between men and canines (inclusive of wolves) in medieval Italy (I think).  At the time I thought that that was a very strange and fruitless topic, needless to say I was a prat!

Now as I attempt to raise a puppy and teach it to respect and interact with humans I can’t help but think this has to be a long standing process since the original domestication of dogs.  In turn it made me think of different cultures relationship with animals, dogs in particular.  From the Vikings who associated wolves with nature, wildness and in relation to humans, Berserkergang (the process of going berserk); to the Ancient Greeks who most commonly associated dogs with hunting (most famously, the Lakonian hound).

With regard to other animals we have the relationship with horses, most obviously.  What I find interesting is my old friend Xenophon even wrote a book on how to ride, train and fight using horse which one has to assume filled a void in the knowledge he saw in his contemporaries.

So as I despair at the biting habits of a teething puppy, who’s obsession with slippers is beyond a joke now.  I enjoy picturing some large, veteran, killing machine of a Spartan chasing a young pup around the house as it runs off with his sandal thinking – is it worth this? So far, in my experience the answer is yes . . .

Posted in University Life | Leave a comment

Doing the Impossible

Book being read: Valerio Manfredi, The Lost Army, (2009) – a fiction book, check me out!  Ok, it is a fiction book by an archaeologist telling the story of Xenophon’s Anabasis and I intend to use it in my thesis, but still . . . fiction!!

There are times I feel, where you believe you can do something unique, something that you have been told can’t be done but you ask why not?  You then follow this “why not?” with an “I’ll show you” and off you go to do the impossible, not unlike a Lhasa Apso puppy charging head first into a fully grown lab/retriever trying to push it over.

I had one such moment many months ago.  As regular readers may remember, I went to the Annual meeting for post graduates of Ancient History and was told the public were to thick to understand what ‘we’ do (see this blog).  ‘We’, unfortunately, meant ancient historians.  I replied that this was not the case and that there was a market for what ancient history is researching and producing at the moment (for example look at Mary Beard’s book sales!).  I was told this was wrong and there was no desire for ‘our’ work.  Well, I said ‘why not?’, followed by “I’ll show you” and wombled off.

This was followed quickly by an idea I had to write an article proposal on my research of combat stress in ancient Greek warfare – but rather than dumb it down or just story-tell, the proposal was solely about the methodology of such a study and the use of Biology in history.  To my surprise Ancient Warfare magazine accepted it with open arms, even to the point of ignoring their own deadlines so it could be included.  But this was not in a normal edition but their 2011 special anniversary edition for the Battle of Marathon!  This put my work along some rather illustrious names.

So there it stands, a popular history article in a popular history magazine solely about cutting edge (if I do say so myself) research methodology, I had done it – I was revolutionary . . . well, that was until I read the magazine myself.  Unfortunately for me (fortunate for anyone else who reads it) I was not the only one who wrote on their methodology; in fact one of the most illustrious authors, Peter Krentz of who’s work I am a big fan, had done the exact same thing about locating the battle site. Something new and exciting has happened, and I am a part of it, but not as a revolutionary – I’ll have to find something else to do that!

So I say to any budding or well standing historian, ask “why not?” to the critics you encounter, tell them you will show them and run off to do so; just don’t be surprised if you find a selection of people doing the same thing.  For, as the cliché goes, you are unique – just like everybody else.

Posted in Ancient History & My Research, Lessons Outside of Syllabus | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Dublin conference and why David Starkey is a bad historian.

Books being read: Apollonius, Argonautica/ L. Tritle, A New History of the Peloponnesian War/ J. Evans, Doglopaedia: A Complete Guide to Dog Care/ Sophocles, Ajax

Having spent the weekend at a conference at University College Dublin called ‘Warfare in Antiquity: Approaches and Controversies’, I heard papers being given on how the subject of Ancient Military history has to change and the major flaws in our work that needs resolving, including a paper I gave called “Combat Trauma: A Methodological Approach”.  The conference was a brilliant exploration of the role of historians, the responsibilities of their work and the dangers of flawed history on the wider public . . .

I then returned home to this.

What does one say about this . . . well, other than the stupidity of the argument based on basic methodological flaws (the idea that there is just one ‘black’ culture, is quite reminiscent of the idea that Africa is a country!) there is the embarrassing example of old historians not keeping up with basic truisms; there cannot ever be one sole factor responsible, society and culture are not stagnant concepts but are ever changing, skin colour does not dictate personality traits, etc.

He also, as an historian, forgets that every opinion has an antithesis based in as much, if not more, fact; his assertion of ‘black’ culture being synonymous with ‘gangster’ culture fails to explain the Kray twins or Al Capone, for instance.

Unfortunately we are stuck with the rambling idiocy of a man that the media have found and made into an authority, a name that no self-respecting historian of any period takes seriously, least of all references him!  Needless to say this does not help the reputation of the subject.

At the same point where our subject has hit a new low, I feel enthused by the progress the actual subject is making in new research.  This then raises the question of how do we get the good historians out to the public and the bad ones thrown off the pedestal of authority?  Something that can only happen when two things are realised;

1.) The public are not stupid and don’t need bad history spoon fed to them without evidence of critical though

2.) History is not for the privileged few and should be spread at the highest standard to all who are interested.

Until then we will have to suffer with the ridiculous delusions of ‘historians’ who think because they talk people must listen.

Posted in Ancient History & My Research, Lessons Outside of Syllabus, Tangents | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

History repeats itself or people rarely change?

Book being read: Michael Palin, Diaries 1969-1979: The Python Years

This is just a quick observation that I have about other people’s observations, oddly enough.  It all began with Michael Palin’s description of the media’s portrayal of the youth in 1969 that sounded familiar;

“It shows how evil papers like News of the World [are] . . . They have chosen to pick isolated incidents . . . and make them seem like crimes.  They are trying their best indict a young generation.”

This got me thinking because the youth then are now in charge and are doing the same thing now – interesting.  This got me to another observation about the youth:

“With the reduction of the system of discipline of the young generally and in the large secondary schools in particular, youth has gained a possibly unwanted power and arrogance”

“Teachers were treated with contempt and, in some cases, assaulted by truculent show-offs.   Classes were being disrupted and indiscipline grew to an alarming rate.”

You would be excused for thinking that these are descriptions of modern schooling since the destruction of discipline and order that supposedly came at the end of the 90′s and early millennium.  But oh no, these are the words of Bill Sheeran in an unpublished thesis he wrote on Boxing and aggression – 1978!!  The second quote of his is referring to the introduction of the leaving age minimum at 16 years old.

It made me chuckle anyway, and always does as I now hear my peer group talk about their school days as if it was idyllic, and teenagers were well behaved and polite to elders and other such rubbish (remembering we were the generation of hoodies, skaters and playstations).  But we will end up talking like that, as our parents do also (just as falsely it seems), as no doubt Bill Sheeran will of his time just as falsely.

Just one of those observations, nothing seems to change and no problem seems to be original; just a different generation experiencing it.

Posted in Tangents | Tagged , , , , | 3 Comments

Historical Impact

Book being read: J. Shay, Odysseus in America: Combat Trauma and the Trials of Homecoming/ R. Protz, The Great British Beer Book

“They haven’t been trained . . . they wouldn’t know how to read it”, these were the words said to me by a fellow PhD student as to why he believed historical academic articles should NOT be made widely available to the public.  I probed him further on the issue but it came back to his belief that people who were not educated (like himself) do not deserve the fruits of his labour . . . no this is not a joke!

As I prepare for a conference I have had a paper accepted for, the very title of which is Warfare in Antiquity:  Approaches and Controversies”, I wonder whether the fact that I believe strongly in the dissemination of knowledge for all and so engage directly with the popular market means my academic views are somehow tarnished in my peers’ eyes.  The paper itself is on . . . regular readers will have guessed . . . methodology!  It is a controversial paper that is being allowed to air its full controversy (it spans more than just “I disagree with this one historian”, but rather attacks many standard views on human individualism and many of the building blocks of historical study); however, I wonder if the fact that I have already released the idea (abridged and made more interesting to read, it should be added) to the popular market and it will be released in the upcoming special from Ancient Warfare Magazine, is the more controversial topic?  Made more so by the fact that methodology is the believed to the most boring aspect of history, and yet this proves there is a market for it.

If so, that is a sad state of affairs.

Historians are frustrated at the moment by the term ‘impact’, a word they are now graded by to gain more funding.  The impact of their research on their subject and public society is scrutinised and evaluated, lack of impact means less funding (in theory at least).  I personally embrace it as it is forcing people to think about the point of what they are studying, something they haven’t contemplated for many decades.  And at the end of the day, if public money is funding you, shouldn’t the public enjoy the product?

But then what do I know, I didn’t go through the same educational process as our critic above.

Posted in Ancient History & My Research, Tangents, University Life | Tagged , , , , , , , | 1 Comment